Understand the source
- 01
Run the prepared simulated robot arm
- 02
Understand one practice attempt and its score
Public research sourceUC BerkeleyRAIL
First understand what UC Berkeley researchers are trying to learn through RAIL, why the question matters, how they test it, and what the result cannot prove. Give a simulated robot position-and-speed numbers, camera images, or human demonstrations and compare which helps it learn faster. The student then completes A robot-learning management app that tracks learning efficiency and requests demonstrations when needed. For a college application or interview, the student separates the source research from their feature, interface, tests, failures, and revisions. Available online or in person in Apgujeong, in one-to-one or small-group formats.
University and lab names show where each public project came from. CIT independently designed these courses; they are not official university courses, partnerships, or endorsements.
Primary routes
CIT keeps the international-school route first, followed by the separate science and gifted-school route.
CIT lessons can run online across Korea and overseas or in person in Apgujeong. The student owns the question, code, tests and explanation; classes do not guarantee admission, selection or awards, and online delivery never changes an institution's submission rules.
Teach the same simulated robot task with position-and-speed numbers, camera images, and human demonstrations. Compare which input reduces the practice needed.
Students first use a small working example to understand the researchers' question, method, and evidence. A controlled change helps identify what the student's extension must solve. The student then implements a useful feature, connects an operator interface, and tests the integrated application in normal, boundary, and failure cases.

A robot-learning management app that tracks learning efficiency and requests demonstrations when needed
The final package includes runnable instructions, the feature and interface design, normal and failure tests, one documented revision, and a three-minute explanation in the student's own words.
Eight introductory sessions
The 20 courses are eight-session CIT studios in which students understand a public university or lab project, confirm a working example, and then turn it into a small robotics application with a useful feature and an operator interface. Selected courses add an optional LLM explanation tool that can read run records but cannot control the robot. RoboMaster has 28 sessions, and implementation scope is adjusted to each student's experience and computer access.
Run the prepared simulated robot arm
Understand one practice attempt and its score
Learn first from number data only
Learn from camera images
Change only whether human demonstrations are used
Implement the student-owned feature: A feature that selects useful human demonstrations and requests another example when learning stalls or repeatedly fails
Build the operator interface: A learning-progress screen showing practice count, success rate, demonstration timing, and representative failure clips. Add the bounded assistant: Optional: an LLM reads only student run records and failure notes to draft questions for the next demonstration. It does not choose robot actions.
Integrate, test, and demonstrate: A robot-learning management app that tracks learning efficiency and requests demonstrations when needed
Public project used in class
Public projects can change over time. To keep the class example consistent, CIT uses version 1fa2af7496be of rail-berkeley/serl. CIT checked it on 2026-08-14; it was created on 2025-10-27. Usage-rights note: Apache-2.0.
1fa2af7496beThe student separates the parts of a robot that learns by trying, and compares runs with and without the demonstration data. In class the project is separated into five boxes (input, memory, process, output, control). The lesson opens one of them, changes one value, and leaves the rest closed.
Wrist-camera images, robot joint states, and the human demonstrations recorded up front
The replay buffer holding past attempts, and the network weights that learning changes
The classifier that judges success, and the learning step that updates the policy from that judgement
The next motion command sent to the robot server, and the training log
The launcher that starts the acting side and the learning side separately and sets the order between them
The files the lesson opens, by name. The course is not a walk through the repository; it opens a chosen few and says which.
One value moves and everything else stays. The right-hand column is the prediction written before the run, not a result; the work is reconciling the two.
On a narrow screen, swipe the picture sideways.
The universities and labs named here made the open projects this course reads. CIT designed the course independently; it is not an official, affiliated, or endorsed course.
Clear answers about what students do, what they need, and where the project came from.
University and lab names show where each public project came from. CIT independently designed these courses; they are not official university courses, partnerships, or endorsements.
Not required for franka_sim. The course starts with a robot on the computer or a saved recording of a completed run. Computer guidance: GPU recommended for training.
Recommended level: Intermediate to advanced. Students should be able to follow a guided Python example, test one controlled change, and then build and explain a small feature and interface.
The completed project is A robot-learning management app that tracks learning efficiency and requests demonstrations when needed. The student implements A feature that selects useful human demonstrations and requests another example when learning stalls or repeatedly fails and A learning-progress screen showing practice count, success rate, demonstration timing, and representative failure clips. Optional: an LLM reads only student run records and failure notes to draft questions for the next demonstration. It does not choose robot actions.
Explain the source research question, method, evidence, and limits first. Then separate the student's own feature and interface decisions, normal and failure tests, revisions, and next question. The source institution's name does not imply affiliation or guarantee admission.
CIT reviewed version 1fa2af7496be of rail-berkeley/serl on 2026-08-14. That version was created on 2025-10-27. We keep this version during class so the example does not change unexpectedly, and we check the setup again before teaching.
Yes. This course is offered online and in person at CIT in Apgujeong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with one-to-one and small-group options. Placement and current availability are confirmed after a readiness consultation.
Before placement, we check the student's coding and math experience, available computer, interests, and ability to explain what happened.
Request a course consultation