Skip to main content
CIT.EXPERIENCE LAB

COLLEGE APPLICATION RESEARCH EVIDENCE · 고등

감정 자료를 나누는 AI의 편향과 한계 확인감정 자료를 종류별로 나누는 AI 편향·한계 감사

Subgroup checks, abstention, and user correction

The course was designed from open research published by Carnegie Mellon and Stanford. Students first explain how university researchers study whether technology is useful, easy, fair, and safe. They then distinguish their own question, design choice, A/B result, failure, revision, and limit for an authentic college application or interview explanation.

Course roadmap
Research questionStudent A/B testEvidence and limitsOwn contribution
01 / User and context

Synthetic inputs from different languages and contexts

Input, label, uncertainty, correction, and system response

Emotional experienceSocial experienceThinking experience
02 / Problem

Average performance hides failures in specific contexts and disagreement between people.

Target experienceSubgroup checks, abstention, and user correction

03 / Testable requirements

Turn a need into a clear system promise

  • Name the user and context, then map the full experience.
  • Choose one design variable and a clear test rule.
  • Let the user change settings or turn off an unwanted feature.
04 / Alternatives

One variable, two versions

  • Prototype A: show the information and action directly.
  • Prototype B: test a different sense, order, or feedback style.
05 / Practical test

Check it with the same real task

Give both versions the same safe task. Compare success, time or errors, and a short user rating.

06 / Evidence

Use numbers and user comments

  • At least one action measure
  • Anonymous design or experience rating
  • Accessibility check and an open comment
AB

The chart values are synthetic examples for this course page, not student results.

07 / Redesign

Use the evidence to improve once

Change one feature supported by both the numbers and user comments. Record the before-and-after result and one limit.

08 / Ethics and accessibility

A good score is not the whole experience

Do not guess or manipulate a person's inner state. Use minimal data, clear choices, and an opt-out.

Human control

The user keeps final control.

clarifycorrectoverrideopt-outdelete

When the model lacks context or confidence, it should pause and ask the user.

09 / Student output

Experience map, requirements, Prototype A/B, test chart, and before-and-after case study

Python/JupyterSynthetic data

Limit: A small class pilot is early evidence. Record how people and contexts differ, then name the next question to test.

Course consultation

Turn a student's interest
into an experience project.

We can match the grade, coding experience, and topic to paper, Figma, Scratch, web, Python, or robotics.

Ask about the course